Don't like Windows 8's new interface? Sick of Ubuntu Unity and the new ads that come along with it? Maybe it's time to create your own, ideal operating system with just the features you want. Arch Linux can make it happen: it lets you build your own personal, killer Linux distro from the ground up. If this article looks familiar, it's because we've posted it before!
However, Arch recently changed its installation process quite a bit, making our old guide outdated. Due to the popularity of this guide, we've updated it to work with Arch's new process, so we can all keep getting our Arch fix and hopefully introduce a few new users to the OS of their dreams.
Here's why you may want to use Arch Linux, followed by how to set it up. Linux is popular for a number of reasons, but high on that list is the fact that, with Linux, you have a lot more power to tweak your OS to your liking.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Review 24 Cores of Impressive
You also have the opportunity to learn more about the way computers and operating systems work. While Ubuntu certainly fits this bill when compared with Windows or Mac OSintermediate Linux users may be itching to try something new.
Arch Linux is a great distribution for intermediate users looking to dig into Linux a bit more and essentially roll your own fast, stable, super-personalized distro. The key part of this explanation is "intermediate users. If you are a rookie, that's awesome—welcome to the wonderful world of Linux—but you won't want to start here.
Check out our guide to getting started with Linux firstand when you've used something like Ubuntu or Mint for awhile, come on back here for some serious Linux action. If you're familiar with something like Ubuntu and are comfortable with the basic ideas of command line work and configuration files, read on, because Arch Linux is a great next step. This guide has two parts.
The first half describes the philosophy behind Arch Linux and its benefits as a distro, while the second part is a very simplified guide on setting up your first Arch install.
I won't go through some of the more basic explanations since, as Linux users, you probably know how to burn an ISO image to CDwhat the difference between and bit operating systems isand so on. Bear in mind that while this guide should get you started, this is by no means a one-stop-shop for all Arch Linux knowledge. I highly, highly recommend you also browse the Arch Linux Wikiespecially the Beginner's Guidebefore you actually begin.
Slashdot Top Deals
The forums are also a great source of info, so check them out as well. If you just follow the steps in this guide and go "ta-dah!
The Beginner's Guide can be a bit overwhelming, since it incorporates so many different possibilities that many first-timers won't deal with, so I've created this guide to inspire you and help show you that it isn't as nerve-racking as it may seem—but you'll still want to use multiple resources when you go to install your system.
As Arch is definitely not for Linux beginners, you may be wondering what its advantages are. While it's pretty popular among developers and the like, it's also pretty popular among general tweakers and geeks that like to really get at the nuts and bolts of a system. If you've been a Linux user for a little while and you'd love to get a bit deeper and learn about how it works—so you can more properly and openly configure it to work for you—Arch is the perfect next step in your journey.Workstation Update - AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Build, 32 core Workstation for Game Development
The philosophy behind Arch is what's known as The Arch Way : simplicity at its finest.I'm planning a build around AMD's Ryzen platform. How mature is virtualization with AMD's new architecture?
I plan to use Hyper-V and I haven't seen any real issues here, but at the same time, I haven't seen MS said they officially supported Ryzen. Please let me know if there are any quirks I need to look out for, or any relevant comments about this.
I guess if this is a single CPU system, you are okay, as it is only sixteen cores. So you consumer the full 16 in a single socket. If doing that, then that still makes sense. I lept to two sockets in my head there. I assumed because of the architecture that you'd be non-Windows. With current Windows core licensing, Threadripper is insanely expensive for anything but purely non-Windows workloads. To pay a massive premium for a consumer proc wouldn't make sense.
For Linux or BSD workloads, it's a great deal. Yes scott, single socket. I'm leaning towards ECC because gb is enough mem used to scare me if there are any kinds of corruption, even in test environment. If there are too many issues using this "consumer" setup as a VM host, then I can just repurpose it to a dev desktop.
I'm interested to see how you go with this as I'm planning a Ryzen build next year. By modern I mean 4. If you hit those marks, then you are golden. But for a desktop lab or such machine, Threadripper will impress for sure, just feed it the requisite memory and you will be good. Currently my plan is to use a Xeon v4 for main use and another Sandy Bridge Xeon for replication just in case. But ryzen's threadripper is also a good choice, but I'm not really in a position to fully accept it.
I haven't had any problems yet with VMware Workstation 12 or 14 on my Ryzen x. Unlike intel who nerfs all server features from their xeon line to become the consumer chips. As Assjae noted you''l have more problems with quirky MB support and hence issues with USB chipsets and other nuttiness. AMD support in the server space has shriveled in my experience given that there is pretty much no viable configurations where Opteron's make sense anymore.
Now AMD wants back in and as usual is screaming how serious they are this time, but fabs making motherboards aren't just going to start pimping Tier 1 server hardware because of marketing. The Ryzen might be a true Xeon killer, but it's irrelevant if you can't get equivelant class system boards with actual server class add-ons; RAID controllers. NICs, etc. VMware workstation is going to be more flexible, but it's kind of pointless using a desktop rig for ESX or Hyper-V unless it's for very base testing.
CPU is only a small part of the equation.Cvs prepaid phone cards
I realize this is an older post and you're asking about AMD Ryzen but I gotta give my workstation some kudos. I built a system almost 10 years ago. I used to be "All-Intel" until my son and I built the system described when he came home on leave. Time for a new build. And the NEW alleged problems. Please forgive typos. Ripped and replaced a bunch of Cisco access layer switches last night.
More to do tonight then finish ALL over weekend. To continue this discussion, please ask a new question.As has been known for a while now, AMD Ryzen Threadripper processors really show their true potential on Linux with often significant increases to the performance thanks to the kernel's better scalability compared to Microsoft Windows. In this article are benchmarks of Windows 10 Professional and Windows 10 Enterprise against Linux on the Threadripper X when going from 16 cores to threads for seeing how the three operating systems are scaling.
What does it take to build a driving simulator at home? The KnewKey Rocksete aims to impress with both sight and sound alike, combining a typewriter-style keyboard with a JBL surround sound system. Featuring two separate batteries and two different lighting systems, the Rocksete is a fusion of two peripherals for those who are looking for a portable peripheral solution. Seagate offers a unique solution in the FireCuda Gaming Dock.
Join us as we explore what it's all about. It left us impressed.Eurozona, produzione industria aprile -0,5% mese e -0,4% annuo
Home News Reviews Windows vs. Intel Core iX Review bit-tech. Windows vs. Your Name required : Already registered on this website? Click here to login. Your Rating required :.
Windows Windows 10 Debotnet 0.At this point, our benchmarking sessions take days to run and we are generating well over a thousand data points. We are also running workloads for software companies that want to see how their software works on the latest hardware.
As a result, this is a small sample of the data we are collecting and can share publicly. Our position is always that we are happy to provide some free data but we also have services to let companies run their own workloads in our lab, such as with our DemoEval service. What we do provide is an extremely controlled environment where we know every step is exactly the same and each run is done in a real-world data center, not a test bench.
We are going to show off a few results, and highlight a number of interesting data points in this article. This is one of the most requested benchmarks for STH over the past few years. The task was simple, we have a standard configuration file, the Linux 4. We are expressing results in terms of compiles per hour to make the results easier to read:.
Plenty of single and multi-core performance along with solid memory bandwidth means that the Threadripper X performs very well here. We have been using c-ray for our performance testing for years now. It is a ray tracing benchmark that is extremely popular to show differences in processors under multi-threaded workloads.
We are going to use our 8K results which work well at this end of the performance spectrum. This test is similar to some of the Windows rendering tests in that AMD performs very well. Here, the WX is able to best the newer X by a small margin. We started using the program during our early days with Windows testing. It is now part of Linux-Bench. With the previous generation Threadripper, the compression speed was much lower than with the current generation.
That is an indicator of a major architectural shift. Here are the comparison results for the legacy data set:. We added some of our dual CPU results here. Each Intel Xeon Gold has 16 cores but spread across two sockets. Sysbench is another one of those widely used Linux benchmarks. This is a test where we see fairly straightforward performance stacking based on core counts which makes sense.
OpenSSL is widely used to secure communications between servers. We first look at our sign tests:.I was compiling the kernel for my boxes for the most part of the 90's and 00's and the funny thing is a subsecond compile time was always possible with the "latest gear".
Like a MHz pentium. The kernel has gotten bloated. Back in the day, it could easily run in 8 megabytes of RAM, with plenty left over for the userspace and cache. Nowadays, just the kernel code before loading any modules is already bigger than that. I was one of the first who worked on embedded Linux, and I put the kernel and a user-space program in a device with kb RAM once. It was too tight to do anything useful with, but just barely. It was no problem doing useful stuff on a 2 MB device this was in : Though to Linux defence, it is not nearly as bloated over this period of time as, say, Windows, by orders of magnitude.
And, you aren't required to compile in everything. It's just very tedious and frankly a bit pointless to trim it down. What is GDS in this context? Compiling Firefox or Wireshark or Libreoffice all work the machine harder than a make world.
Took 14 hours to compile the kernel Why is it that an ssh session takes 8 seconds to establish? Why is it that browsing a network share is 10x slower than viewing a file list was on a BBS? Edit your sshd config and add useDNS: no to it, don't forget to restart the deamon. Either way, I get your point, I remember programming in Delphi, compiling, chatting on IRC and browsing the net with a 56K Winmodem all the modulation was software driven with a Pentium 2 all at the same time, and now I can't even have and IDE and slack open at the same time.
GordonS 4 months ago. I'm old enough to remember 14k, 28k and 56k modems - and while yh internet held great wonder, waiting for pages to load and files to download was really frustrating. Oh, and having to hangup so my parents could make a phonecall wasn't fun either!Hey penny penny song download
This at least is something that has got orders of magnitudes better, and is very much noticeable. At times I still shake my head in wonder at being able to download a GB in less than 2 mins on a residential FttC connection. Something's wrong with your DNS setup, I guess. SSH session takes less than one second to establish for me.
Because not everything is CPU bound. But all the other bounds have improved massively, too: - CPUs are multiple orders of magnitude faster - GPUs are multiple orders of magnitude faster - RAM is multiple orders of magnitude faster and more abundant - Disks are multiple orders of magnitude faster and bigger - Network connections are multiple orders of magnitude faster Why is it that the end result feels the same?
The answer, of course, is that software complexity has kept pace: software, like a gas, expands until it fills its container. No, the answer is your ssh configuration.
You're hanging on timeouts, either doing DNS resolution or trying multiple auth mechanisms. Use -vvv to find the hangup.
I wasn't the author of the original comment. SSH ain't a problem for me. I was talking more about system responsiveness in general. You are getting good replies, but the main answer is There are so many little reasons for slower modern computers, but it seems to come down to increased complexity and, I guess, entropy? It's frustrating. Regarding your SSH session, have you turned off gssapiauth assuming you aren't using it?
Sounds like you have a slow network and are using protocols optimized for high throughput on LAN connections. CodeWriter23 4 months ago.There are two kinds of desktop CPU platforms. Its high-end sibling takes everything up a level with more cores, more memory channels, and more bandwidth for graphics and storage. A considerable upgrade in every regard, this high-end desktop platform appeals to power users, content creators, and prosumers who want to blur the line between desktop and workstation.
Yet they each have their own distinct flavor as well. With the Strix XE Gaming, hardcore gamers can build stylish rigs with power to spare for high-quality streaming. Which X motherboard should you buy for your build?
They share a single package that plugs into a new TR4 socket with an astounding individual pins. The accompanying quad-core memory controller doubles the bandwidth available on standard desktops and lets you run a staggering GB of DDR4 memory on a single board. Bandwidth ripples across every inch of the processor. The PCI Express 3.
To put that into perspective, Ryzen has just 20 open lanes, or a third of the peripheral bandwidth inside Threadripper. Most high-end desktop chips stop there, but not Threadripper. The processor even has an interface for the onboard audio codec. They offer dedicated headers for pumps and all-in-one coolers, so you can get up and running quickly without fussing over the setup.
Our ROG models also have headers for monitoring coolant flow and temperatures, and the Zenith Extreme boasts an extra one reserved for custom monoblocks. This allows the cooling to react to a range of different workloads, like gaming binges that turn your graphics card into a space heater, and complex rendering that lights up all the cores on your CPU. With a single click, our 5-Way Optimization software automatically configures your cooling and overclocks your processor.
The auto-tuner acts like a personalized overclocking service by slowly increasing the CPU frequency and testing stability to find the sweet spot for your chip and cooling. The mother lode of PCI Express lanes stands ready for the multiple high-end graphics cards required for truly cutting-edge gaming and VR experiences. All of our X motherboards support three-way SLI and CrossFireX setups, and the Zenith Extreme can call upon a fourth card for record-setting benchmark attempts or an extra jolt of compute power.
To protect your investment, SafeSlot reinforces the graphics slots against damage from increasingly heavy GPU coolers. The fastest SSDs can heat up under heavy sustained loads, causing performance to drop when you need it the most. To improve thermals, the M. On top of that, the boards come with U. With so much bandwidth inside the platform, we had to give our X motherboards lots of ultra-fast connectivity to reach outside the box.
For external devices, USB 3.Lets go on a journey together. To live up to its name, it must be something truly exceptional. My vision for Excelsior! PC Part Picker. Tai Chi, meet Threadripper. This unboxing was very satisfying, not gonna lie. An included torque wrench? These emerald warriors fit right in. The time before they were part of the team feels like a distant memory.
Wraith Ripper, with the help of your friend T. I will return soon to further flesh out this first post, but for now I eagerly await your feedback, whether it be on hardware choices, system design, software advice, or otherwise! Good luck! For me, nothing on the windows boxes is important and anytime yesterday is fine, but YMMV.
I assume the! Seriously though that is some serious hardware, you seem to be writing my dream PC. I do plan on try a lot of different things to learn and see what works best though. Thank you so much for your valuable input! I composed and submitted a well thought out response, but it must have been lost in the ether.
However, ProxMox VE 5. I have read that for threadripper, I really want a kernel that is 4. Going down this rabbit hole, it seems like ArchLinux would be my best bet for a Host OS that is properly updated. What do you think? Return to Level1Techs. Build a PC. TheHobbyist December 11,pm 1.Deutz code list
Greetings True Believers! Other Linux KVM? Hardware acquired!
- Laravel response api
- Bitmex websocket example
- Vz grips k6s
- Flex iptv apk
- Best spine hospital in the world
- Voiceflow review
- Bosch urea dosing module
- Iida x denki ship name
- Risultati parziale 27/04
- Architecture presentation speech example
- Artisti f
- Best hindi dubbed series magic hollywood 300mb
- Best fescue grass seed for charlotte nc
- Lyca tv usa
- Combustion of methane word equation
- How to open user exit in sap
- Geoip2 django
- Lucky csgo hvh
- Configuring switch port security
- Thomas trainz whistles
- Gcf and lcm examples